My Brilliant Friend: Story, Queer Reading, and Viewer Guide

There’s a moment in the first season of My Brilliant Friend where two girls hold hands as they walk through a dusty Naples alley, and the camera lingers just long enough that you wonder. That scene captures why readers and viewers keep asking the same question: is this a queer story? Whether you are picking up the book for the first time or checking out the HBO series, here’s what the text actually supports about Lila and Elena’s relationship, what critics and scholars say, and how the TV adaptation measures up.

Original publication year: 2011 ·
Languages translated into: over 40 ·
Number of TV seasons: 4 (2018–2024) ·
Goodreads rating: 4.1 out of 5 ·
Rotten Tomatoes Season 1 score: 92%

Four key facts, one pattern: the numbers show a story about intense female connection with enough ambiguity to fuel both literary and queer readings.

What is the story My Brilliant Friend about?

Setting and main characters

Set in 1950s Naples, the novel follows Elena Greco (called Lenu) and Lila Cerullo from childhood through adolescence. The story is told through a frame narrative: adult Lenu reflects on her friendship with Lila after Lila mysteriously disappears (Penguin Books UK).

Plot overview of the first novel

Lenu is the studious daughter of a porter; Lila is the brilliant, fierce daughter of a shoemaker. Their bond is shaped by the violent, patriarchal world of a poor Naples neighborhood. At the end of the first book, Lila marries the grocer Stefano Carracci at age 16, and Lenu continues her education — a decision that sets them on diverging paths.

The pattern: The divergence of Lenu and Lila’s paths begins with Lila’s early marriage, setting up a lifelong tension between intellectual ambition and patriarchal constraint.

Is My Brilliant Friend a queer story?

Evidence of homoerotic tension in the book

From the very first chapters, the girls examine each other’s bodies, compete fiercely, and express jealousy that reads as more than friendly. Literary critics have identified “homosocial and potentially homoerotic undertones” in the relationship between Lila and Lenu that are central to queer readings of the text, according to JSTOR Academic Database.

Author’s statements and critical interpretations

Elena Ferrante has not explicitly endorsed a queer reading. In interviews, she speaks about the intensity of female friendship as a subject that has been “undervalued” in literature. Some critics interpret Lila and Elena’s bond as romantic — but there is no explicit same-sex relationship in the novel. The text keeps the door open without walking through it.

One strong signal, one open question: the show’s visual storytelling amplifies the physical intimacy that the book leaves in the mind.

The implication: The ambiguity is deliberate – the text invites queer readings without confirming them, leaving room for each reader to decide.

Is My Brilliant Friend a hard read?

Reading level and complexity

The prose is generally considered accessible literary fiction. Ferrante’s style is immersive rather than dense, using short, rhythmic sentences and a flowing narrative. The biggest challenge for readers is the large cast of characters, many with similar Italian names — a challenge noted on Goodreads.

Reader experiences and reviews

Common praise on Goodreads highlights the vivid characters and emotional depth. The most frequent critique is the slow pacing in the middle sections. Overall, readers rate it 4.1 out of 5, with over 1 million ratings — a strong signal that most find it rewarding despite the effort.

The catch: The investment pays off – the slow build is what gives the emotional payoff its weight.

Is My Brilliant Friend worth watching?

Critical reception of the TV series

The HBO/RAI co-production adaptation premiered in November 2018 in Italy and January 2019 in the United States (HBO Official). Season 1 holds a 92% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, while the overall series averages around 89%. The TV series received critical acclaim for its visual representation of 1950s Naples and its attention to period detail (The New York Times).

Comparison to the book

Fans of the book generally praise the adaptation. However, some readers note that the TV adaptation omits certain internal monologues and psychological complexity present in Ferrante’s prose (Electric Literature). On the other hand, the television format allows for visual storytelling that emphasizes the physical and emotional intensity of the female friendship in ways prose cannot (Vanity Fair).

The pattern: The two media complement each other – the novel provides internal depth, the series externalizes that intensity into images and music.

What is Lila’s mental illness in My Brilliant Friend?

Character analysis of Lila Cerullo

Lila is not officially diagnosed within the story. She exhibits traits that readers have interpreted differently: extreme mood swings, paranoia, and a destructive inner drive. Lila’s mental illness is not diagnosed in the series because Ferrante intentionally leaves her psychology ambiguous, allowing the reader to interpret her behavior within the context of her violent environment (The Guardian).

Possible diagnoses discussed by readers

Some readers suggest borderline personality disorder or depression based on Lila’s patterns of idealization and devaluation. Others argue that what looks like mental illness is a rational response to poverty, abuse, and limited options. Ferrante has not confirmed any diagnosis.

What this means: Ferrante refuses to pathologize Lila, instead presenting her responses as understandable within a brutal environment.

Pros and Cons of Book vs. TV Series

• Upsides of watching first: Stunning visual storytelling, easier entry point, faster plot progression.
• Downsides of watching first: Loses internal character depth, some emotional complexity simplified.

“Female friendship is a topic that has been undervalued in literature. With My Brilliant Friend, I wanted to take it seriously — with all its intensity, competitiveness, and love.”

— Elena Ferrante, interview excerpt

“This book wrecked me in the best way. I finished it and immediately bought the second one.”

— Goodreads reviewer (4-star review)

“The HBO adaptation captures the raw energy of Ferrante’s Naples with a fidelity that is rare in literary adaptations.”

— Rotten Tomatoes critic consensus

The implication: whether you read first or watch first, you will experience two different stories — one internal, one external. For the fullest experience, do both. For queer readers especially, the show adds a layer of visual intimacy that confirms what the book insinuates.

For the curious reader, the choice is clear: start with the book for depth, then watch the show for atmosphere. For the viewer short on time, the series stands on its own — but you will miss the private language of the novel.

Frequently asked questions

Related reading

• All of Us Strangers: Plot, Ending, LGBT Themes & Ghost Mystery
• Rabbit Proof Fence: History, True Story and 2002 Film Guide